Publication date: November 12, 2026
A blockchain is a public ledger, yet the proceeds of crypto fraud still disappear every day. Using the AdBlast pyramid scheme, which according to press reports harmed up to 90,000 people and caused losses of around USD 32 million, we trace how investor money is moved from a “private wallet” to cash withdrawn at an ATM. We then look at the criminal, fiscal and regulatory tools available in Poland as of November 2026, a moment when MiCA’s transitional period has expired but Poland still has no national crypto-asset supervisor, and at what this means for victims seeking to recover their funds.
More
Publication date: November 10, 2026
Clinical research, diagnostic testing and commercialisation under Polish and EU law
Law as at 5 November 2026
Abstract
A change in an epigenetic clock may justify further investigation of a medicine. Its value as evidence of benefit depends on what the clock measures, the population in which it has been validated and whether treatment effects on the score predict effects on health. The same assay may be used to analyse archived samples, select participants for treatment or sell a test to consumers. Each use raises a different legal question. This article traces those questions from trial design through to commercial use, with particular attention to Polish law on medical experiments, performance studies, access to medical records and the use of data from non-commercial clinical trials.
Keywords ageing biomarkers, geroprotectors, clinical trials, IVDR, biobanks, genetic data
More
Publication date: November 10, 2026
10 November 2026
From 11 November 2026, telecommunications undertakings in Poland must meet new technical and operational requirements for the interfaces that give law enforcement and security agencies access to communications and related data. Interfaces already running under existing agreements may stay on the previous standard, but for no longer than 36 months. The new rules add 5G standards, real-time delivery and a dedicated interface for retained data.
More
Publication date: November 04, 2026
Technical debt, GDPR and NIS2 – how yesterday’s shortcuts turn into tomorrow’s liability
Why technical debt arises
Technical debt is a phenomenon that sooner or later affects almost every IT project. It consists in choosing a solution that is quicker to deliver but inferior in technical quality. A team usually “takes out” this loan under pressure from the business side, for which the key metric is time-to-market – the sooner the product reaches the market, the better.
In the short term this brings a quick win, but in the future the company has to start paying the “interest”. It shows up as ever higher system maintenance costs, a slowdown in the pace of work, and the mounting frustration of developers who, instead of developing the product, must keep fixing the same defects over and over. Although the term “technical debt” appears nowhere in legislation, concepts such as due diligence and the adequacy of technical measures in practice force companies to keep that debt from spiralling out of control.
More
Publication date: November 02, 2026
A growing number of businesses are investing in artificial intelligence and expect to recover the cost of those projects through the research and development (R&D) tax relief. The Polish tax authorities and the Supreme Administrative Court, however, draw a clear line: integrating an off-the-shelf AI model or implementing a commercially available system – however advanced or “self-learning” – is not R&D activity. The relief is available only to those who create new technology themselves and bear genuine research risk. We explain how the tax authorities’ “two-step test” works, what the Frascati Manual and the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court say, which costs in IT projects qualify and which are traps – and how to document the work so that the deduction survives a tax audit.
More
